|
Menu
|
|
|
Social
|
|
|
|
IRAQ WAS NOT A THREAT - BUT IT IS NOW!
Contributed by
steeleyes
on
Monday, 17th January 2005 @ 08:57:52 AM in AEST
Topic:
war
|
Iraq was no threat to the US No weapons of mass destruction No connection to 9/11 No links to international terrorism
And now, how do things stand? After the Bush lies and attack? Whats the situation on the ground In the mess that is Iraq?
The terrorists have a new cause For a generation or more A training ground and a recruitment call New hatred now in store
Iraq was no threat to the US No weapons of mass destruction No connection to 9/11 No links to international terrorism
Iraq was contained Observed and brought to heel They had no chance to misbehave No chance to cut a deal
But now its blown wide apart With free access to the terrorist cause A nation could be toppled An anarchy replace its laws
Infiltration estimates Are put at 1 in 4 Who knows WHAT the future holds? As fatalities now soar
Iraq was no threat then But it sure is NOW But Bush still keeps lying About his holy cow
How long will the liar Continue to be believed? As Iraq becomes uncontrollable And more families bereaved?
Bush has taken a controlled state And produced a total mess And where its going to end my friend Is anybodys guess
--O/--
From the log of Iraqi blogger Riverbend
The Phantom Weapons...
This was an interesting piece of news a couple of days ago:
The United States has ended its physical search for weapons of mass destruction (WMD) in Iraq, which was cited by the first administration of President George W Bush as the main reason for invading the country, the White House has said.
Why does this not surprise me? Does it surprise anyone? I always had the feeling that the only people who actually believed this war was about weapons of mass destruction were either paranoid Americans or deluded expatriate Iraqis- or a combination of both. I wonder now, after hundreds and hundreds of Americans actually died on Iraqi soil and over a hundred-thousand Iraqis are dead, how Americans view the current situation. I have another question- the article mentions a 'Duelfer Report' stating the weapons never existed and all the intelligence was wrong. This report was supposedly published in October 2004. The question is this: was this report made public before the elections? Did Americans actually vote for Bush with this knowledge?
Over here, it's not really 'news' in the sense that it's not new. We've been expecting a statement like this for the last two years. While we were aware the whole WMD farce was just a badly produced black comedy, it's still upsetting to hear Bush's declaration that he was wrong. It's upsetting because it just confirms the worst: right-wing Americans don't care about justifying this war. They don't care about right or wrong or innocents dead and more to die. They were somewhat ahead of the game. When they saw their idiotic president wasn't going to find weapons anywhere in Iraq, they decided it would be about mass graves. It wasn't long before the very people who came to 'liberate' a sovereign country soon began burying more Iraqis in mass graves. The smart weapons began to stupidly kill 'possibly innocent' civilians (they are only 'definitely innocent' if they are working with the current Iraqi security forces or American troops). It went once more from protecting poor Iraqis from themselves to protecting Americans from 'terrorists'. Zarqawi very conveniently entered the picture.
Zarqawi is so much better than WMD. He's small, compact and mobile. He can travel from Falloojeh to Baghdad to Najaf to Mosul whichever province or city really needs to be oppressed. Also, conveniently, he looks like the typical Iraqi male- dark hair, dark eyes, olive skin, medium build. I wonder how long it will take the average American to figure out that he's about as substantial as our previously alleged WMD.
Now we're being 'officially' told that the weapons never existed. After Iraq has been devastated, we're told it's a mistake. You look around Baghdad and it is heart-breaking. The streets are ravaged, the sky is a bizarre grayish-bluish color- a combination of smoke from fires and weapons and smog from cars and generators. There is an endless wall that seems to suddenly emerge in certain areas to protect the Green Zoners... There is common look to the people on the streets- under the masks of fear, anger and suspicion, there's also a haunting look of uncertainty and indecision. Where is the country going? How long will it take for things to even have some vague semblance of normality? When will we ever feel safe?
A question poses it self at this point- why don't they let the scientists go if the weapons don't exist? Why do they have Iraqi scientists like Huda Ammash, Rihab Taha and Amir Al Saadi still in prison? Perhaps they are waiting for those scientists to conveniently die in prison? That way- they won't be able to talk about the various torture techniques and interrogation tactics...
I hope Americans feel good about taking their war on terror to foreign soil. For bringing the terrorists to Iraq- Chalabi, Allawi, Zarqawi, the Hakeems How is our current situation going to secure America? How is a complete generation that is growing up in fear and chaos going to view Americans ten years from now? Does anyone ask that? After September 11, because of what a few fanatics did, Americans decided to become infected with a collective case of xenophobia Yet after all Iraqis have been through under the occupation, we're expected to be tolerant and grateful. Why? Because we get more wheat in our diets?
Terror isn't just worrying about a plane hitting a skyscraperterrorism is being caught in traffic and hearing the crack of an AK-47 a few meters away because the National Guard want to let an American humvee or Iraqi official through. Terror is watching your house being raided and knowing that the silliest thing might get you dragged away to Abu Ghraib where soldiers can torture, beat and kill. Terror is that first moment after a series of machine-gun shots, when you lift your head frantically to make sure your loved ones are still in one piece. Terror is trying to pick the shards of glass resulting from a nearby explosion out of the living-room couch and trying not to imagine what would have happened if a person had been sitting there.
The weapons never existed. It's like having a loved one sentenced to death for a crime they didn't commit- having your country burned and bombed beyond recognition, almost. Then, after two years of grieving for the lost people, and mourning the lost sovereignty, we're told we were innocent of harboring those weapons. We were never a threat to America...
Congratulations Bush- we are a threat now.
- posted by river @ 10:53 PM
Copyright ©
steeleyes
... [
2005-01-17 08:57:52] (Date/Time posted on
site)
Advertisments:
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry, comments are no longer allowed for anonymous, please register for a free membership to access this feature and more
|
|
All comments are owned by the poster. Your Poetry
Dot Com is not responsible for the content of any
comment. That said, if you find an offensive comment, please
contact via the FeedBack Form with details, including poem title
etc.
|
|
|
Re: IRAQ WAS NOT A THREAT - BUT IT IS NOW!
(User Rating: 1 ) by CurtisC on
Monday, 17th January 2005 @ 09:09:14 AM AEST (User
Info | Send
a Message)
|
i agree completely, i couldn't believe that idiot got re-elected. Look at it this way, we have 4 more years to laugh at him :) good write...
Curtis |
|
|
Re: IRAQ WAS NOT A THREAT - BUT IT IS NOW!
(User Rating: 1 ) by Former_Member on
Monday, 17th January 2005 @ 10:05:09 AM AEST (User
Info | Send
a Message)
|
i respect your opinion but Iraq is an issue that to be honest could have been avoided with only 3 ways.
1. Saddam to step down.
2. Saddam to die naturally.
3. The U.S and the U.K killing him off.
As option 3 has been attempted many a time that ruled that out.
If the war was about oil and possibly oppresion, does that mean it's wrong?
In my opinion, no.
The troops out there are also British.
|
|
|
Re: IRAQ WAS NOT A THREAT - BUT IT IS NOW!
(User Rating: 1 ) by deadheadpoet on
Monday, 17th January 2005 @ 11:01:39 AM AEST (User
Info | Send
a Message)
|
WOW Very good write and I couldn't agree more. I was just reading this morning about Benderman refusing to return to war because of the immense horrors he saw. I am proud of him. How can anyone condone war? I also feel like this, Saddam and Bush, they are no different. This country is just sneakier and self righteous. Claiming every thing we do is morally right. Bush and his cohorts care nothing for other human beings. Their motivation is POWER, money and oil. Will this country ever realize WE ARE NO BETTER THAN ANYONE ELSE? Much peace to you. Thanks for geting me fired up this morning! |
|
|
|